Phillip E. Johnson
Johnson (June 18, 1940 – November 2, 2019) was an American legal scholar and authority on criminal law who was the Jefferson E. Peyser Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. He co-founded the Center for Science and Culture (CSC) at the Discovery Institute and was one of the leaders of the intelligent design movement, along with William Dembski and Michael Behe. Johnson described himself as "in a sense the father of the intelligent design movement".
Also recorded as Phillip Johnson
Phillip E. Johnson
- Name
- Phillip E.
- Born
- 18 June 1940
- Birthplace
- Aurora, Illinois, U.S.
- Died
- 2 November 2019
- Place of death
- Berkeley, California, U.S.
- Known for
- Advocacy of intelligent design
- Education
- Harvard University (BA) University of Chicago (JD)
- Occupation
- * Law professor
- Nationality
- United States
- Fields
- law · criminology · criminal law · Darwinism
- Languages
- English
VALÉORINE Encyclopedia
VALÉORINE documentary reading
Documentary summary
Johnson (June 18, 1940 – November 2, 2019) was an American legal scholar and authority on criminal law who was the Jefferson E. Peyser Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. He co-founded the Center for Science and Culture (CSC) at the Discovery Institute and was one of the leaders of the intelligent design movement, along with William Dembski and Michael Behe. Johnson described himself as "in a sense the father of the intelligent design movement".
Admitted source layer · organised and presented by VALÉORINE
Note VALÉORINE
Phillip E. Johnson (1940–2019) was a jurist, lawyer and philosopher, among other activities, of American nationality. The jurist was born in Aurora and died in Berkeley.
Phillip E. Johnson was educated at Harvard University, University of Chicago Law School and West Aurora High School. The jurist worked for University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Activity centred on criminal law, criminology and Darwinism.
Among the works is Darwin on Trial. Languages used include English.
Composed from admitted, traceable facts · 27 September 2026
VALÉORINE
Reference Check
Propose documentary evidence for Phillip E. Johnson. A contribution is never written directly as fact: identity, source, rights and evidence gates still decide.
Sign in to contribute
World of VALÉORINE
Documentary connections
Only confirmed graph relationships appear here. Images are shown only when their identity and reuse rights both pass the documentary gate.
Documentary evidence
Documentary basis
Authority files
wikidata · Q726924 · wikipedia · Phillip E. Johnson
In this article
Biography
Biography
Johnson was an opponent of "fully naturalistic evolution, involving chance mechanisms and natural selection". Johnson argued that scientists accepted the theory of evolution "before it was rigorously tested, and thereafter used all their authority to convince the public that naturalistic processes are sufficient to produce a human from a bacterium, and a bacterium from a mix of chemicals."
Johnson studied at Harvard University, University of Chicago Law School and West Aurora High School. The recorded working language is English. The field of work recorded is law, criminology and criminal law. Employment is recorded with University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Works named in the authority record are Darwin on Trial.
Key facts
Key facts
• Name — Phillip E. Johnson • Born — 18 June 1940 • Birthplace — Aurora, Illinois, U.S. • Died — 2 November 2019 • Place of death — Berkeley, California, U.S. • Known for — Advocacy of intelligent design • Notable Works — Darwin on Trial (1991) • Title — Jefferson E. Peyser Professor of Law • Education — Harvard University (BA) University of Chicago (JD) • Occupation — * Law professor • author
Early life and education
Early life and education
Johnson was born in Aurora, Illinois, on June 18, 1940. He graduated from West Aurora High School in 1958. During high school, he was accepted to attend Harvard University while still a junior, and enrolled at Harvard at age 16. He graduated from Harvard College with a Bachelor of Arts in English literature in 1961 and became a teacher in rural Kenya afterwards. Johnson then studied law at the University of Chicago and graduated first in his class from the University of Chicago Law School with a Juris Doctor (J.D.) in 1965. As a law student, Johnson was an editor of the University of Chicago Law Review. Throughout college, he was agnostic. After law school, Johnson served as a law clerk for Chief Justice Roger J. Traynor at the California Supreme Court from 1965 to 1966, then clerked for Chief Justice Earl Warren at the Supreme Court of the United States from 1966 to 1967. He was admitted to the State Bar of California on January 11, 1966.
Academic career
Academic career
Upon finishing his clerkship at the U.S. Supreme Court, Johnson was offered a professorship at Yale Law School, but declined. Instead, he joined the faculty at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, as he recalled the professors there as "more like me—public school types". From 1967 to 2000, Johnson was an active professor of law at the UC Berkeley School of Law and retained the title of professor emeritus at the time of his death. Johnson served as deputy district attorney and held visiting professorships at Emory University and at University College London.
Views
Views
At the age of 38, Johnson became a born again Christian following a divorce, and later became an elder in the Presbyterian Church (USA). Johnson recounted that while on a sabbatical in England he sought, through prayer, inspiration for what he should do with the rest of his life, and then received an epiphany after he read Richard Dawkins' The Blind Watchmaker (1986) and Michael Denton's Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985). Johnson later said, "Something about the Darwinists' rhetorical style made me think they had something to hide." Despite having no formal background in biology, he felt that he could add insight into the premises and arguments. Johnson stated that he approached the creation evolution dispute not as a scientist but as an academic lawyer by profession, with a specialty in analyzing the logic of arguments and identifying the assumptions that lie behind those arguments. He noted that what people think about evolutionism depends very heavily on the kind of logic they employ and the kind of assumptions they make. Further, he pointed out that four of the eleven members of the special committee appointed by the National Academy of Sciences to prepare its official booklet titled Science and Creationism were lawyers. (That first edition of the publication, which was finished in 1984, was prepared as an amicus brief in the Edwards v. Aguillard case that went before the U.S. Supreme Court.) In 1989, Of Pandas and People by Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon was published as the first book to promote intelligent design. The first edition of Darwin on Trial was published in 1991. In notes listing his sources, Johnson said about Of Pandas and People that "This book is 'creationist' only in the sense that it juxtaposes a paradigm of 'intelligent design' with the dominant paradigm of (naturalistic) evolution, and makes the case for the former. It does not rely on the authority of the Bible." Following that, Johnson sought supporters for his "Wedge Strategy". In the ID blog Evolution News, Casey Luskin described him as the godfather of the intelligent design movement, and PBS said he was "known as the father of intelligent design". Johnson was a critic of methodological naturalism, the basic principle that science can only investigate natural causes for observable phenomena, and espoused a philosophy he called "theistic realism." He was the author of several books on intelligent design, science, philosophy, and religion, as well as textbooks on criminal law. He has appeared on various programs such as PBS's Firing Line and a Nova episode, "Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial."
Intelligent design
Intelligent design
Johnson was known as one of the founders of the intelligent design movement, principal architect of the wedge strategy, and the author of the Santorum Amendment. Johnson rejects common descent and does not take a position on the age of the Earth. These concepts are a common theme in his books, including Darwin on Trial, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education (1995), Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds (1997), and The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism (2000). Eugenie Scott wrote that Darwin on Trial "teaches little that is accurate about either the nature of science, or the topic of evolution. It is recommended neither by scientists nor educators." Working through the Center for Science and Culture, Johnson wrote the early draft language of the Santorum Amendment, which encouraged a "Teach the Controversy" approach to evolution in public school education. Nancy Pearcey, a Center for Science and Culture fellow and Johnson associate, credits Johnson's leadership of the intelligent design movement in two of her most recent publications. In an interview with Johnson for World magazine, Pearcey says, "It is not only in politics that leaders forge movements. Phillip Johnson has developed what is called the 'Intelligent Design' movement..." In Christianity Today, she reveals Johnson's religious beliefs and his criticism of evolution and affirms Johnson as "The unofficial spokesman for ID" The scientific community views intelligent design as pseudoscience and junk science.
Darwin on Trial
Darwin on Trial
In the book Darwin on Trial, 1991, Johnson disputed the tenets of evolution and promoted intelligent design. He wrote the book with the thesis that evolution could be "tried" like a defendant in court. Darwin on Trial became a central text of the intelligent design movement.
Wedge strategy
Wedge strategy
In its earliest days the intelligent design movement was called the 'wedge movement'. The wedge metaphor, attributed to Johnson, is that of a metal wedge splitting a log and represents using an aggressive public relations program to create an opening for the supernatural in the public's understanding of science. Johnson acknowledges that the goal of the intelligent design movement is to promote a theistic agenda as a scientific concept. According to Johnson, the wedge movement, if not the term, began in 1992: The movement we now call the wedge made its public debut at a conference of scientists and philosophers held at Southern Methodist University in March 1992, following the publication of my book Darwin on Trial. The conference brought together as speakers some key Wedge figures, particularly Michael Behe, Stephen Meyer, William Dembski, and myself. Rob Boston of Americans United for Separation of Church and State described the wedge strategy: The objective [of the wedge strategy] is to convince people that Darwinism is inherently atheistic, thus shifting the debate from creationism vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the non-existence of God. From there people are introduced to 'the truth' of the Bible and then 'the question of sin' and finally 'introduced to Jesus.' Johnson is one of the authors of the Discovery Institute's Wedge Document and its "Teach the Controversy" campaign, which attempts to cast doubt on the validity of the theory of evolution, its acceptance within the scientific community, and reduce its role in public school science curricula while promoting intelligent design. The "Teach the Controversy" campaign portrays evolution as "a theory in crisis." In his 1997 book Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds Johnson summed up the underlying philosophy of his advocacy for intelligent design and against methodological and philosophical naturalism: If we understand our own times, we will know that we should affirm the reality of God by challenging the domination of materialism and naturalism in the world of the mind. With the assistance of many friends I have developed a strategy for doing this,... We call our strategy the "wedge". Johnson has described the wedge strategy as: • "We are taking an intuition most people have [the belief in God] and making it a scientific and academic enterprise. We are removing the most important cultural roadblock to accepting the role of God as creator." • "Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit, so that we can get the issue of intelligent design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools." • "This isn't really, and never has been, a debate about science. It's about religion and philosophy." • "So the question is: 'How to win?' That's when I began to develop what you now see full-fledged in the 'wedge' strategy: 'Stick with the most important thing' —the mechanism and the building up of information. Get the Bible and the Book of Genesis out of the debate because you do not want to raise the so-called Bible-science dichotomy. Phrase the argument in such a way that you can get it heard in the secular academy and in a way that tends to unify the religious dissenters. That means concentrating on, 'Do you need a Creator to do the creating, or can nature do it on its own?' and refusing to get sidetracked onto other issues, which people are always trying to do." When asked how best to raise doubts and question evolution with non-believers, Johnson responded:
Wedge of Truth
Wedge of Truth
The book Wedge of Truth, published by Johnson in 2000, is an expansion of the Wedge Document. He states that truth has the ability to speak for itself.
Personal life and death
Personal life and death
Johnson had two children and lived with his wife in Berkeley, California. In 2004, he was awarded the inaugural "Phillip E. Johnson Award for Liberty and Truth" by Biola University, a private evangelical Christian college noted for its promotion of intelligent design. Johnson died on November 2, 2019, at his home.
Criminal law
Criminal law
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Darwinism
Darwinism
* * * * * * * * * *
Life and career
Dated record
Life and career
The full dated record · 2 entries
1940
Phillip E. Johnson born at Aurora.
2019
Phillip E. Johnson died at Berkeley.
Places
Named by the record
Places
Only places the record itself states, plotted where the house gazetteer settles their coordinates. Nothing is inferred from a name or a nationality.
Aurora.
Birth place
Berkeley.
Death place
Criticism
Johnson has been accused of being intellectually dishonest in his arguments advancing intelligent design and attacking the scientific community. Johnson has employed numerous equivocations regarding the term "naturalism," failing to distinguish between methodological naturalism (in which science is used to study the natural world and says nothing about the supernatural) versus philosophical naturalism (the philosophical belief that nothing exists but the natural world, and adopts as a premise the idea that there is no supernatural world or deities). In fact-checking Johnson's books Darwin on Trial and Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, Brian Spitzer, an associate professor of biology at the University of Redlands, argued that almost every scientific source Johnson cited had been misused or distorted, from simple misinterpretations and innuendos to outright fabrications. Spitzer described Darwin on Trial as the most deceptive book he had ever read. In 1993 the ASA's Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith published a review of Darwin on Trial by Nancey Murphy, an associate professor of Christian philosophy at Fuller Theological Seminary, who described Johnson's arguments as "dogmatic and unconvincing", primarily because "he does not adequately understand scientific reasoning." In a later interview she said she faced a campaign to get her fired after she expressed her view that intelligent design was not only poor theology, but "so stupid, I don't want to give them my time." Murphy, who accepts the validity of evolution, said that Johnson called a trustee in an attempt to get her fired and stated "His tactic has always been to fight dirty when anyone attacks his ideas." Johnson admits he had spoken with a former trustee of the seminary who was himself upset with Murphy, but denies any responsibility for action taken against her. He said: "It's the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees... They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason." Since Johnson is considered by those both inside and outside the movement to be the father and architect of the intelligent design movement and its strategies, his statements are often used to validate the criticisms leveled by those who allege that the Discovery Institute and its allied organizations are merely stripping the obvious religious content from their anti-evolution assertions as a means of avoiding the legal restrictions of the Establishment Clause, a view reinforced by the December 2005 ruling in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial which found that intelligent design is not science and is essentially religious in nature. They argue that ID is an attempt to put a patina of secularity on top of what is a fundamentally religious belief and thus that the "Teach the Controversy" exhortation is disingenuous, particularly when contrasted to his statements in The Wall Street Journal and other secular media. Critics point out that contrary to the Discovery Institute's and Johnson's claims, the theory of evolution is well-supported and accepted within the scientific community, with debates regarding how evolution occurred, not if it occurred. Popular disagreement with evolutionary theory should not be considered as a reason for challenging it as a scientifically valid subject to be taught, they contend. Critics of Johnson point to his central role in the Discovery Institute's carefully orchestrated campaign known as the wedge strategy. The wedge strategy, as envisioned by the Discovery Institute, is designed to leave the science establishment looking close-minded in the short term with a long-term goal being a redefinition of science that centers on the removal of methodological naturalism from the philosophy of science and the scientific method, thereby allowing for supernatural explanations to be introduced as science. Critics note that Johnson, as a principal officer of the Discovery Institute, often cites an overall plan to put the United States on a course toward the theocracy envisioned in the wedge strategy, and that the Discovery Institute as a matter of policy intentionally obfuscates its agenda. According to Johnson, "The movement we now call the wedge made its public debut at a conference of scientists and philosophers held at Southern Methodist University in March 1992." During the 1990s, Johnson and several others challenged the scientific consensus by claiming that HIV tests do not detect HIV, AIDS statistics are grossly exaggerated, and that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. As a member of The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis, a prominent AIDS denialist group, Johnson questioned if HIV caused AIDS. He wrote several articles about the subject, including a piece in Reason magazine. He was one of the 12 founding members of The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis and signatory to the group's letter to the editor of Science asserting that HIV is only tautologically associated with AIDS and that HIV tests are inaccurate. Johnson, along with others, have been criticized for their questioning of the scientific and medical consensus that HIV causes AIDS. In the Washington University Law Review, Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey faulted Johnson, Wells and others for denying the HIV/AIDS connection and promoting denialism via a petition designed to garner publicity but which did not have any scientific support.
Literature
Scholarly footprint
A count of publications is evidence of attention, not of standing, and is given here only as a measure.
Notes from the source article
Cited by Wikipedia
Notes from the source article
These works are cited by the source article, in its own numbering. They are recorded as its citations, not as sources VALÉORINE has verified.
- 1.Silliman, Daniel. Died: Phillip E. Johnson, Lawyer Who Put Darwin on Trial. News & Reporting. 2019-11-05.
- 2.Berring, Robert. In Memoriam: Phillip E. Johnson, Jefferson E. Peyser Professor of Law. University of California. 2020.
- 3.Glanz, James. Darwin vs. Design: Evolutionists' New Battle. The New York Times. 2001-04-08. 0362-4331.
- 4.Defending Intelligent Design - NOVA. PBS. 6 April 2007.
- 5.Branch, Glenn. Phillip Johnson dies. National Center for Science Education. November 5, 2019.
- 6.West Aurora High School. West Aurora Inducts 6 Alumni into Hall of Honor'. 2005.
- 7.Stafford, Tim. The Making of a Revolution. Christianity Today. 8 December 1997.
- 8.Front Matter. University of Chicago Law Review. 32. 1. 97. Autumn 1964.
- 9.Johnson, Philip E. Inherit the Wind: The Play's the Thing. Regent University Law Review. 13. 2. 279–288. 1997.
- 10.State Bar of California. Phillip E Johnson.
- 11.UC Berkeley School of Law. Faculty Profiles.
- 12., Forrest, 2001
- 13.Johnson, Phillip E. Berkeley's Radical. Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity. Fellowship of St. James. 15. 5. June 2002. 0897-327X.
- 14., Dembski , 2006
- 15.Johnson 2010, p. 32, n.3.
- 16.Labov, Jay B. Understanding Our Audiences: The Design and Evolution of Science, Evolution, and Creationism. CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. 1. 20–24. March 2008. 1931-7913.
- 17.JHU Press. Creationism in Europe. 10–11. 27 November 2014. 978-1-4214-1563-5.
- 18.Why Phillip Johnson Matters: A Biography Evolution News. Evolution News. 2011-11-17.
- 19.Defending Intelligent Design — NOVA. www.pbs.org. October 2007.
- 20.Johnson, Phillip E. Third-Party Science. Books & Culture. 2. 3. May–June 1996.
- 21.Video. 203.
- 22.Discovery Institute Responses to PBS/NOVA's "Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial" Movie Evolution News. Evolution News. 2009-02-11.
- 23.Powell, Michael. Doubting Rationalist. The Washington Post. May 15, 2005.
- 24.Olasky. Creationists and Intelligent Design. World Magazine Blog. God's World Publications. January 27, 2004. 0888-157X.
- 25.Scott, Eugenie C. Review Article: Darwin on Trial, by Phillip Johnson. Creation/Evolution. 12. 31. 47–56. December 2013.
- 26.Larson, Edward J. Biology Wars: The Religion, Science and Education Controversy. Religion & Public Life Project. Pew Research Center. March 29, 2006.
- 27.Pearcey, Nancy R. Wedge Issues. World. 15. 29. July 29, 2000. 0888-157X.
- 28.Pearcey, Nancy R. We're Not in Kansas Anymore. Christianity Today. May 22, 2000. 0009-5753.
- 29.Mu, David. Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design. Harvard Science Review. 19. 1. 22–25. Fall 2005.
- 30.Workosky, Cindy. National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush. National Science Teachers Association. August 3, 2005.
- 31.Attie, Alan D. Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 116. 5. 1134–38. May 1, 2006. 0021-9738.
- 32.See: 1) List of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. 3) The Discovery Institute's A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism petition begun in 2001 has been signed by "over 600 scientists" as of August 20, 2006. 4) A four-day A Scientific Support for Darwinism petition gained 7,733 signatories from scientists opposing ID. 5) The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects ID. 6) More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. 7) List of statements from scientific professional organizations on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.
- 33.Orr, H. Allen. Devolution. The New Yorker. May 30, 2005.
- 34.Pennock 1999
- 35.Bergin, Mark. Junk science. World. 21. 8. February 25, 2006. 0888-157X.
- 36.Stewart, Robert. Intelligent design: William A. Dembski Michael Ruse in dialogue. Fortress Press. 2. 2007. 978-0-8006-6218-9.
- 37.Forrest, Barbara. Understanding The Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. Center for Inquiry. May 2007.
- 38.Nickson, Elizabeth. Let's Be Intelligent about Darwin. National Post. Postmedia Network. February 6, 2004. 1486-8008.
- 39.Grelen, Jay. Witnesses for the prosecution. World. 11. 28. 18. November 30, 1996. 0888-157X.
- 40.Buell & Hearn 1994
- 41.Johnson, Phillip E. The Wedge: Breaking the Modernist Monopoly on Science. Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity. 12. 4. July–August 1999. 0897-327X.
- 42.Boston, Rob. Missionary Man. Church & State. April 1999. 2163-3746.
- 43., Johnson , 1997 , pp = 91–92
- 44.Watanabe, Teresa. Enlisting Science to Find the Fingerprints of a Creator. Los Angeles Times. March 25, 2001.
- 45.Johnson, Phillip E. How to Debate the Issue. The Kennedy Commentary. Coral Ridge Ministries.
- 46., Johnson , 2000, p= 13
- 47.Pieret, John. Another Dishonest Creationist Quote. TalkOrigins Archive. The TalkOrigins Foundation, Inc. February 16, 2004.
- 48.Spitzer, Brian. The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth?. Talk Reason. August 4, 2002.
- 49.Isaak, Mark. A Philosophical Premise of 'Naturalism'?. Talkdesign.org. Wesley R. Elsberry. September 24, 2002.
- 50.Scott, Eugenie C. Darwin Prosecuted: Review of Johnson's Darwin on Trial. Creation/Evolution. 13. 33. 36–47. Winter 1993.
- 51.Murphy, Nancey. Phillip Johnson on Trial: A Critique of His Critique of Darwin. American Scientific Affiliation.
- 52.Vedantam, Shankar. Eden and Evolution. The Washington Post. W08. February 5, 2006.
- 53.Stewart 2007, p. 2
- 54.Forrest, Barbara. Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press. 11. 2007. 978-0-19-531973-6.
- 55.Johnson, Phillip E. Overestimating AIDS. Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity. 17. 8. October 2004. 0897-327X.
- 56.Epstein 1996
- 57.Robert Laarhoven. HIV & AIDS - Phillip Johnson. VirusMyth: A Rethinking AID$ Website.
- 58.Quittman, Beth. Undercover at the Discovery Institute. Seattlest. Gothamist LLC. September 8, 2006.
- 59.Postmedia Network. Aids 'denialism' gathers strange bedfellows. The Vancouver Sun. June 17, 2006.
- 60.Gey, Steven G. Is it Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution. Washington University Law Review. 83. 1. 2004. 10.2139/ssrn.590882.
- 61.Baumann, Eleen. AIDS Proposal. Science. 267. 5200. 945–6. 1995. 10.1126/science.7863334.
- 62.Thomas, Charles. What causes AIDS?. Reason. June 1994. 0048-6906.
- 63.Young, Craig. AIDS Denialism: A South African Tragedy. GayNZ. J&N Infolink. July 1, 2009.
- 64.Shallit, Jeffrey. AIDS conference proves pseudoscience can kill you. Waterloo Region Record. Metroland Media Group. August 9, 2000. 0824-5150.
- 65.Robert Laarhoven. The Group. VirusMyth: A Rethinking AID$ Website.
- 66.Postmedia Network Inc. Aids 'denialism' gathers strange bedfellows. The Vancouver Sun. June 17, 2006.
- 67.Brauer, Matthew J. Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution. Washington University Law Review. 83. 1. 79–80. 2005. 2166-7993.
- 68.Linder, Doug. Biography of Phillip E. Johnson. University of Missouri–Kansas City. 2004.
- 69.Berkeley's Radical: An Interview with Phillip Johnson. www.arn.org.
- 70.Antony Flew Receives Award From Intelligent Design Community. Biola University.
- 71.Klinghoffer, David. Remembering Phillip E. Johnson (1940-2019): The Man Who Lit the Match. Evolution News. November 3, 2019.
References
Citations
References
Each reference names the institution holding it, so a reader may go to the document itself.
reference work
Wikidata, structured authority record Q726924: Phillip E. JohnsonWikimedia Foundation
Secondary witnessreference work
Secondary witness
The Encyclopedia exists whether or not anything is for sale. Corrections are recorded rather than overwritten, and every version of this record is kept. Published 15 August 2026.
Elsewhere in Books
39,078 published records in this field, each with its sources named.
- PhilippidesAuthor
- Philippine EngelhardAuthor
- Philippus van LimborchAuthor
- PhilistusAuthor
- Phillip MargolinAuthor
- Phillippa Yaa de VilliersAuthor
- Phillips BrooksAuthor
- Phillis WheatleyAuthor
Best supported in this field
For owners
Own a work by Phillip E. Johnson?
A specialist will read what you send and tell you what the house can establish, what it cannot, and whether the object is suited to sale. There is no charge and no obligation. The object stays with you throughout; nothing is shipped to us unless it is arranged in writing beforehand.