Pseudo-Orpheus
Pseudo-Orpheus is the name given to a poetic text that presents the legendary Greek figure Orpheus giving a poetic speech to his son, Musaeus, identified as the biblical Moses, passing on to him hidden wisdom he learned in Egypt. It presents a monotheistic view of God, whom, according to the poem, no one has seen, except for Abraham, who was able to see God due to his skill at astrology. Pseudo-Orpheus appears in multiple recensions (versions created over time).
Pseudo-Orpheus
- Occupation
- poet
- Languages
- Ancient Greek
In this article
Preserved versions
Although the poem is preserved only in quotations by various Christian writers, most scholars believe that the text is originally "of Jewish authorship." Over time, a number of Christian and Jewish authors reworked Greek traditions about Orpheus and used them to support their monotheistic views and to assert the religious supremacy of Moses and monotheism over Greek polytheistic views. The rhetorical device of using legendary non-monotheistic figures to endorse Judaism is likewise found in the Sibylline Oracles.
The following are the primary forms of Pseudo-Orpheus that have survived to the present. The exact dating of the various recensions is disputed. The first extant writer who quotes the work is Clement of Alexandria, who lived around 150 to 215 AD. Clement provides "numerous short quotations" from Pseudo-Orpheus, with one (abbreviated C 2) matching the edition of Eusebius, and the rest (collectively known as C 1) mostly–but not exclusively–in agreement with the version of the poem known as J (see below). The recension which appears in Eusebius (abbreviated E) seems to have been produced in the 2nd or 1st century BC. Eusebius claims to have taken the poem from the writings of Aristobulus of Alexandria, a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher who lived in the 2nd century BC. This version is known as the Mosaic recension because of its focus on Moses. This version is variously counted at either forty-one or forty-six lines of hexameter verse. A shorter recension appears in the works of an author referred to as Pseudo-Justin (approximately or at some unknown point before 300 AD) who is so called because his original name is not known, although he was for a time confused with the 2nd-century writer Justin Martyr. This version contains 21 lines and is referred to as J. Another recension, known as T, or the "Theosophical" recension, contains all the lines found in the other versions of the poem, and mostly agrees with E. This version is found in the Tübingen Theosophy or Theosophy of Tübingen, "an epitome of a late-fifth century collection of oracles".
Licensing
Text attribution
Part of the biographical narrative on this page reuses licensed material. Its origin, revision and licence are recorded here.
The biographical narrative on this page is based on the Wikipedia article Pseudo-Orpheus, revision 1357853490 (EN edition), by its contributors. VALÉORINE has edited that text and built its own documentary record around it. The reused material is available under CC BY-SA 4.0, and this page's reuse of it is offered under the same licence. Everything else on this page — the chronology, the holdings, the evidence, the plates and the connections — is VALÉORINE's own record. Sources and licences.
Cited by Wikipedia
Notes from the source article
These works are cited by the source article, in its own numbering. They are recorded as its citations, not as sources VALÉORINE has verified.
- 1.Carl R. Holladay. The Early Church in Its Context: Essays in Honor of Everett Ferguson. BRILL. 192. 1998. 90-04-10832-7.
- 2.Louis H. Feldman. Philo's Portrayal of Moses in the Context of Ancient Judaism. University of Notre Dame Press. 376. 17 January 2008. 978-0-268-15952-8.
- 3.Radcliffe G. Edmonds III. Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion. Cambridge University Press. 22–25. 7 November 2013. 978-1-107-51260-3.
- 4.Everett Ferguson. Backgrounds of Early Christianity. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. 440. 2003. 978-0-8028-2221-5.
- 5.Carl R. Holladay. The Early Church in Its Context: Essays in Honor of Everett Ferguson. BRILL. 192. 1998. 90-04-10832-7.
- 6.Denise Kimber Buell. Making Christians: Clement of Alexandria and the Rhetoric of Legitimacy. Princeton University Press. 10. 1999. 0-691-05980-2.
- 7.John Lierman. The New Testament Moses: Christian Perceptions of Moses and Israel in the Setting of Jewish Religion. Mohr Siebeck. 233. 2004. 978-3-16-148202-1.
- 8.M. Lafargue. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Hendrickson Publishers. II. 795. 2011. 978-1-59856-490-7.
- 9.InterVarsity Press. Dictionary of New Testament Background: A Compendium of Contemporary Biblical Scholarship. 1294. 11 June 2010. 978-0-8308-6734-9.
- 10.BRILL. Josephus' Contra Apionem. 379. 1996. 90-04-10325-2.
- 11.Taylor Petrey. Resurrecting Parts: Early Christians on Desire, Reproduction, and Sexual Difference. Routledge. 19. 3 July 2015. 978-1-317-44297-4.
- 12.M. Lafargue. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Hendrickson Publishers. II. 795. 2011. 978-1-59856-490-7.
- 13.Rangar Cline. Ancient Angels: Conceptualizing Angeloi in the Roman Empire. BRILL. 21. 5 March 2011. 978-90-04-19453-3.
Citations
References
Each reference names the institution holding it, so a reader may go to the document itself.
reference work
Partially resolvedreference work
Partially resolved
The Encyclopedia exists whether or not anything is for sale. Corrections are recorded rather than overwritten, and every version of this record is kept. Published 14 September 2026.
Elsewhere in Books
37,846 published records in this field, each with its sources named.
- PrudentiusAuthor
- Prvoslav VujcicAuthor
- Prys MorganAuthor
- Przemysław BorkowskiAuthor
- Pseudo-PhocylidesAuthor
- Pseudo-PlutarchAuthor
- Ptolemaeus ChennusAuthor
- PtolemyAuthor
Best supported in this field
For owners
Own a work by Pseudo-Orpheus?
A specialist will read what you send and tell you what the house can establish, what it cannot, and whether the object is suited to sale. There is no charge and no obligation. The object stays with you throughout; nothing is shipped to us unless it is arranged in writing beforehand.