OpenPsych
OpenPsych is an online collection of three pseudoscientific open access journals covering behavioral genetics, psychology, and quantitative research in sociology. Many articles on OpenPsych promote scientific racism, and the site has been described as a "pseudoscience factory-farm". The journals were started in 2014 by a pair of nonprofessional researchers, Emil Kirkegaard and Davide Piffer, who had difficulty publishing their studies in mainstream peer-reviewed scientific journals.
OpenPsych
- Name
- OpenPsych
- Founder
- Emil O. W. Kirkegaard · Davide Piffer
VALÉORINE Encyclopedia
VALÉORINE documentary reading
Documentary summary
OpenPsych is an online collection of three pseudoscientific open access journals covering behavioral genetics, psychology, and quantitative research in sociology. Many articles on OpenPsych promote scientific racism, and the site has been described as a "pseudoscience factory-farm". The journals were started in 2014 by a pair of nonprofessional researchers, Emil Kirkegaard and Davide Piffer, who had difficulty publishing their studies in mainstream peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Admitted source layer · organised and presented by VALÉORINE
Reference Check
Propose documentary evidence for OpenPsych. A contribution is never written directly as fact: identity, source, rights and evidence gates still decide.
Sign in to contribute
Documentary evidence
Documentary basis
Authority files
wikidata · Q85790836
In this article
Overview
Overview
The website describes its contents as open peer reviewed journals, but the qualifications and neutrality of its reviewers and quality of reviews have been disputed.
Key facts
Key facts
• Name — OpenPsych • Founded — 2014 • Founders — Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, Davide Piffer • Country — Denmark • Website — https: openpsych.net/
Founders
Founders
OpenPsych was founded by Danish far-right white supremacist Emil Kirkegaard in 2014. Kirkegaard is also the founder of the white nationalist Human Diversity Foundation which publishes Mankind Quarterly, another pseudoscientific journal. The Mankind Quarterly was published by the Ulster Institute for Social Research, which was presided over by Richard Lynn until his death in 2023. Kirkegaard was the registrant of the Mankind Quarterly website between 2017 and February 2023, after which the WHOIS was anonymised. In February 2024, Kirkegaard filed his Mankind Publishing House LLC with the state of Wyoming under the name William Engman (his legal name since 2021). Co-founder Davide Piffer has written on remote viewing which is widely dismissed by scientists as parapsychology.
Journal contents and quality
Journal contents and quality
OpenPsych consists of three journals—Open Differential Psychology, Open Behavioral Genetics, and Open Quantitative Sociology & Political Science—founded by Emil Kirkegaard and Davide Piffer in 2014. Journal contents are free to access and there is no cost associated with submission. The founders of the website believed that their articles were being regularly rejected by mainstream scientific publishers because of bias against their contentious submissions. Many of the articles are about "race realism", a form of scientific racism, and advance related views which are rejected by mainstream science, such as the idea that there is a genetic basis for group-level differences in measures such as crime and IQ. Unlike typical scientific journals, OpenPsych accepts anonymous manuscripts.
Political positions
Political positions
The journals act as a research network for far right, alt-right, and White nationalist causes, following in the footsteps of the Pioneer Fund and Mankind Quarterly; of its top 15 contributors in 2018, 11 had written for Mankind Quarterly in the preceding three years. Several members of its editorial board hold far-right political views and have attended the controversial London Conference on Intelligence. The Southern Poverty Law Center, in an article discussing proponents of scientific racism including Kirkegaard, describes OpenPsych as a "pseudojournal". Kirkegaard is regarded by the Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right to be a "figure on the radical right fringe". Landis MacKellar has described Emil Kirkegaard and John Fuerst as "both outright cranks" noting OpenPsych are "tenderly peer-reviewed online journals specializing in scientifically controversial (bordering on dubious) politically incorrect pieces derived in part from (Roger) Pearsonian hereditarianism."
OkCupid
OkCupid
In May 2016, Kirkegaard and Julius Daugbjerg Bjerrekær published a paper in Open Differential Psychology that includes the data of nearly 70,000 OkCupid (a dating website) users, such as their intimate sexual details. The publication was widely criticised at the time and been described as "without a doubt one of the most grossly unprofessional, unethical and reprehensible data releases." Although Kirkegaard claimed the data was public, this was disputed by data ethics scholar Michael Zimmer who pointed out that the data is restricted to logged-in users only: Kirkegaard uploaded the OkCupid data to the Open Science Framework, but this was later removed after OkCupid filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) complaint.
Noah Carl
Noah Carl
In April 2019, Noah Carl who reviews submissions for Open Quantitative Sociology & Political Science was dismissed as a research fellow at St Edmund's College, Cambridge University because of his association with OpenPsych, which involved collaborating with a number of individuals who are known to hold racist and far-right political views.
Review process
Eric Turkheimer in a coauthored paper in Perspectives on Psychological Science criticises the review process of OpenPsych's journals and describes them as "pseudo-scientific vehicles for scientific racism":
Academic reception
The quality of peer review at OpenPsych has been disputed. Reviewers do not need advanced academic qualifications, nor need to specialise in what they review. For example, Kirkegaard reviews paper submissions to two of the journals, but has only a BA in linguistics, claiming he is entirely "self-taught". Most of the reviewers are also authors of articles in the same group of journals. Of the thirteen known members of the review board in 2020, two were anonymous and eight seemed to have doctorates. Members of the review teams include Gerhard Meisenberg, Heiner Rindermann, Peter Frost, John Fuerst, Kenya Kura, Bryan J. Pesta, Noah Carl and Meng Hu.
Notes from the source article
Cited by Wikipedia
Notes from the source article
These works are cited by the source article, in its own numbering. They are recorded as its citations, not as sources VALÉORINE has verified.
- 1.Bird, Kevin A. Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism. Frontiers in Genetics. 15. 2024. 10.3389/fgene.2024.1345631.
- 2.van der Merwe, Ben. No, objecting to Cambridge's appointment of a eugenicist is not about free speech. New Statesman. GlobalData. 2018-12-20.
- 3.Panofsky, Aaron. How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 175. 2. 387–398. 2020-09-28. 0002-9483.
- 4.Ward, Justin. Wikipedia wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets. Southern Poverty Law Center. 2018-03-12.
- 5.Wilson, Jason. Scientist cited in push to oust Harvard's Claudine Gay has links to eugenicists. The Guardian. 2024-01-14. 0261-3077.
- 6.Wolfson, Leo. White Supremacist Who Wants Legal Child Porn Doing Business Through Wyoming LLC. Cowboy State Daily. 2024.
- 7.Extrem rechtes Schlossgespenst. Zeit Online. December 20, 2023. English translation:
- 8.Shukman, Harry; Hermansson, Patrik. Race Science Inc. Undercover in The Human Diversity Foundation, the million-dollar race science company. Hope Not Hate. 2024.
- 9.Home Page. Ulster Institute for Social Research.
- 10.Obituaries, Telegraph. Richard Lynn, evolutionary psychologist who declared his belief in the benefits of eugenics – obituary. The Telegraph. 31 August 2023. 0307-1235.
- 11.OpenPsych. About OpenPsych.
- 12.Bird, Kevin. Confronting Scientific Racism in Psychology: Lessons from Evolutionary Biology and Genetics. American Psychologist. November 2023.
- 13.Gillborn, David. The fringe is the centre: Racism, pseudoscience and authoritarianism in the dominant English education policy network. International Journal of Educational Research. Elsevier BV. 115. 2022. 0883-0355.
- 14.Bradbury, Rosie. Hundreds of academics oppose research fellow's eugenics work on discredited "race sciences". Varsity. 2018-12-07.
- 15.van der Merwe, Ben. Former Nuffield fellow denounced for "racist pseudoscience". Cherwell. 2018-12-07.
- 16.van der Merwe, Ben. Exposed: London's eugenics conference and its neo-Nazi links. London Student. 2018-01-10.
- 17.van der Merwe, Ben. It might be a pseudo science, but students take the threat of eugenics seriously. New Statesman. 2018-02-19.
- 18.Barnes, David. Eugenics: White Nationalists Continue To Turn To The False Theory Of Genetic Supremacy. Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right. 2018-06-25.
- 19.MacKellar, Landis. Once Upon a Time in Germany…: A Review Essay. Population and Development Review. 45. 3. 665–673. 2019. 10.1111/padr.12286.
- 20.Giangrande, Evan J. Race, Ethnicity, and the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis: A Cautionary Example of Fringe Science Entering the Mainstream. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 17. 3. 696–710. 2022. 10.1177/17456916211017498.
- 21.Besnick, Brain. (12 May 2018). Researchers just released profile data on 70,000 OkCupid users without permission . Vox.
- 22.Zimmer, Michael. (14 May 2016). Study Reveals the Perils of Big-Data Science . Wired.
- 23.Chang, Lulu. (15 May 2016). Update: OKCupid succeeds in removing 70,000 users' leaked data from public view . Digital Trends.
- 24.St. Edmund's College in the University of Cambridge EXTERNAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE TOBY JACKMAN NEWTON TRUST RESEARCH FELLOW https://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/sites/www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/files/attachments/Investigation%20report%20for%20the%20website.pdf , Independent Report to the Governing Body Sir Patrick Elias, External Investigator 30 April 2019.
References
Citations
References
Each reference names the institution holding it, so a reader may go to the document itself.
reference work
Secondary witness
The Encyclopedia exists whether or not anything is for sale. Corrections are recorded rather than overwritten, and every version of this record is kept. Published 17 August 2026.
Elsewhere in Publishers and printers
5,459 published records in this field, each with its sources named.
- Open Source PressOrganisation
- Open SpaceOrganisation
- Open University of CataloniaOrganisation
- Open University of IsraelOrganisation
- Opera Nazionale MontessoriOrganisation
- OpticaOrganisation
- Optimum Publishing InternationalOrganisation
- OR BooksOrganisation
Best supported in this field
For owners
Own an object connected with OpenPsych?
A specialist will read what you send and tell you what the house can establish, what it cannot, and whether the object is suited to sale. There is no charge and no obligation. The object stays with you throughout; nothing is shipped to us unless it is arranged in writing beforehand.