Leofric Missal
The Leofric Missal is an illuminated manuscript, not strictly a conventional missal, from the 10th and 11th century, now in the Bodleian Library at Oxford University where it is catalogued as MS Bodl.
Also recorded as MS. Bodley 579 · MS. Bodl. 579
Leofric Missal

Anonymous Unknown author · ox.ac.ok · Public domain
- Name
- Leofric Missal
- Date
- 1000
- Language
- Latin · Old English
- Held by
- Bodleian Library
VALÉORINE Encyclopedia
VALÉORINE documentary reading
Documentary summary
The Leofric Missal is an illuminated manuscript, not strictly a conventional missal, from the 10th and 11th century, now in the Bodleian Library at Oxford University where it is catalogued as MS Bodl.
Admitted source layer · organised and presented by VALÉORINE
Reference Check
Propose documentary evidence for Leofric Missal. A contribution is never written directly as fact: identity, source, rights and evidence gates still decide.
Sign in to contribute
Documentary evidence
Documentary basis
Authority files
wikidata · Q6524412 · wikipedia · Leofric Missal
In this article
Key facts
Key facts
• Name — Leofric Missal • Width — 250px • Date — 10th and 11th century • Provenance — Lotharingia and England • State Of Existence — Surviving • Manuscript S — Bodleian Library Bodley 579 • Genre — Missal
Origins and history
Origins and history
The origins of the manuscript date to around 900 AD when a sacramentary was produced in Lotharingia. Anglo-Saxon parts were added to the manuscript during the 10th and 11th centuries, including a calendar of church feasts as well as other information on celebrating the Mass, and some legal records in Old English. The last of these additions date to the episcopate of Leofric, who was Bishop of Exeter from 1050 to 1072. The Missal gained its name from the dedication on the first folio (f) that the book was given by Leofric to his cathedral. This is written in an 11th-century scribal hand, that has been identified as originating at Exeter Cathedral.
Contents
Contents
The Missal consists of three basic sections. The first, named "A" by one of the editors of the manuscript, F. E. Warren, is the sacramentary, probably created in the last half of the ninth century. It contains a large initial (f 154 verso (v)) with human and animal heads and interlace that is thought to have been added in England in the first half of the 10th century. Warren called the second section "B" and identified it as 21 folios of material relating to a calendar, other computus-related material, and four pages of illustrations on both sides of folios 49 and 50. These illustrations, which are full-page and mostly drawings in several colours of ink, were added around 970 in England in a different style to the initial in section A. They are an early instance of the influence from the school of Reims that was part of the formation of the Winchester style through works like the Utrecht Psalter. Their style has been compared to the slightly earlier Winchester manuscript, the Benedictional of St. Æthelwold, though the miniatures there are mostly fully painted. Folio 49r depicts the Hand of God giving the paschal cycle, followed by pages showing standing figures of Vita and Mors ("Life" and "Death"), illustrating the Apuleian Sphere, a method of divination to discover if a patient would live or die, that ultimately originated in Coptic Egypt. Folio 50 v has diagrams with decorations and a bust in a roundel showing the calculation of the date of Easter. There is decoration, in one case a full border, of acanthus foliage, and all the drawings are badly faded. The entire "B" section appears to have originated at Glastonbury Abbey, and seems to have formed a coherent whole. The lack of mention of Edward the Martyr, who died in 979, would place the addition of this material before that date. The rest of the manuscript, which is named "C" by Warren, is a collection of a variety of texts written by over thirty different scribes throughout the 10th and 11th centuries. The information relates to the Mass, manumissions, and other notes and were all written by English scribes. The "C" information is not in one coherent block, as it is not only added at the beginning and the end of the manuscript, but also occupies blank spaces throughout the other two sections. Warren suggested that section "A" was brought by Leofric to England in the 1040s when Leofric returned from the Continent. Warren felt that Leofric then added "B", which was a pre-existing manuscript that Leofric acquired, and "C", which were notes that Leofric had accumulated. Other scholars, however, including Robert Desham, feel that section "A" was in England by about 940. Desham then argues that "B" was specifically composed before 979 to bring a foreign and older sacramentary up to date. "C", according to Desham, was composed over time during the 10th and 11th centuries, and thus Leofric had little hand in the creation of the Missal.
History of the document
Dated record
History of the document
The full dated record · 2 entries
1000
Leofric Missal created.
1000
Leofric Missal is recorded from 1000.
Literature
Literature
Literature
The Leofric Missal (review), The Catholic Historical Review, 2004
The Leofric Missal and tenth-century English art, Anglo-Saxon England, 1977
The Leofric Missal
The sevenfold-fivefold-threefold litany of the saints in the Leofric Missal and beyond, Anglo-Saxon England, 2014
Scholarly footprint
Literature
Scholarly footprint
A count of publications is evidence of attention, not of standing, and is given here only as a measure.
Notes from the source article
Cited by Wikipedia
Notes from the source article
These works are cited by the source article, in its own numbering. They are recorded as its citations, not as sources VALÉORINE has verified.
- 1.Pfaff "Liturgical Books" Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England pp. 290–291
- 2.Deshman "Leofric Missal" Anglo-Saxon England pp. 145–146
- 3.Deshman "Leofric Missal" Anglo-Saxon England pp. 147–148
- 4.Deshman "Leofric Missal" Anglo-Saxon England throughout. On pp. 156–157 he considers whether the Utrecht Psalter was a specific influence on the Missal, a view he finds "hard to maintain".
- 5.Deshman "Leofric Missal" Anglo-Saxon England pp. 159–166
- 6.Dodwell Pictorial Arts p. 100
- 7.Deshman "Leofric Missal" Anglo-Saxon England pp. 146–147
Bibliography printed in the source article · 2
- Orchard, N. A. The Leofric Missal. Boydell & Brewer. 1. 13–14. 2002. 978-1-870252-17-1.
- Warren, F. E. The Leofric Missal, as Used in the Cathedral of Exeter. Clarendon Press. 1883.
References
Citations
References
Each reference names the institution holding it, so a reader may go to the document itself.
reference work
Secondary witnessreference work
Secondary witness
The Encyclopedia exists whether or not anything is for sale. Corrections are recorded rather than overwritten, and every version of this record is kept. Published 16 August 2026.
Elsewhere in Manuscripts
376 published records in this field, each with its sources named.
- La Cava BibleManuscript
- Lambeth BibleManuscript
- Lancelot en prose - BNF Fr113-116Manuscript
- Leo BibleManuscript
- León Bible of 920Manuscript
- León Bible of 960Manuscript
- Leven van LutgartManuscript
- Libellus de Medicinalibus Indorum HerbisManuscript
Best supported in this field
For owners
Own a copy of Leofric Missal?
A specialist will read what you send and tell you what the house can establish, what it cannot, and whether the object is suited to sale. There is no charge and no obligation. The object stays with you throughout; nothing is shipped to us unless it is arranged in writing beforehand.