Jürgen Roth

The Rheinische Post sees Roth as one of the "best experts on the subject." However, he is considered a "contentious and, because of his polemics, controversial journalist," according to the Berliner Zeitung on July 9, 2009. Thomas Feltes, criminologist at the Ruhr University Bochum, wrote: "Without his books, the average reader would be missing something, and certainly also some investigators who, after their publication, will eagerly search for who is quoted, named or otherwise indirectly mentioned in them." There were several court cases against Roth because of his publications. Former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder took legal action against his 2006 book The Germany Clan: The Unscrupulous Network of Politicians, Top Managers and the Judiciary. The court ruled that Roth had to rewrite a passage in the book in which he linked a trip by Schröder to the United Arab Emirates with his work for Gazprom. However, Schröder's lawyers also tried to prevent the sale of the new, unobjectionable edition by issuing warnings to booksellers. Roth had previously presented an excerpt of his research activities on the news portal Fair Observer. Following an interim injunction obtained by the lawyer of a Leipzig restaurateur at the Leipzig Regional Court, the book Mafialand Deutschland had to be withdrawn from bookstores and could only be sold with blacked-out passages. In February 2010, former Bulgarian Interior Minister Rumen Petkov sued Roth for defamation. Roth had linked Petkov to the mafia and illegal drug trafficking. On 14 October 2010, Roth was acquitted by the Sofia District Court and the defamation charge was dismissed. From the summer of 2007, Roth wrote about an alleged Saxony swamp over claims that high-ranking politicians, lawyers, police officers and journalists were members of mafia structures. Roth was heavily criticized by the journalist Reiner Burger, who describes the Saxony swamp as a legend, in a series of articles in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Burger also justified the criticism with past lost court cases; according to Burger, Roth was sentenced to pay damages by the Hamburg Regional Court in 2000 for his 1999 book The Grey Eminence and in 1999 for a television report. Burger accused Roth, among other things, of failing to speak directly to the people affected. In this context, Roth had to retract statements on his homepage about a Leipzig businessman. The witness whom Roth had relied on had told untruths and was sentenced to a fine of 4,200 euros by the Dresden District Court in spring 2008. Roth defended himself by saying that he had only not questioned the person directly in one case for a blog entry, and criticized Burger's attacks as "Kafkaesque" because Burger ignored, among other things, that important witnesses were put under pressure in the "Saxony swamp". In 2009, the investigative committee of the Saxon state parliament did not come to a clear conclusion about the "Saxony swamp". The CDU and FDP consider it to be refuted, the Green Party and the Left Party claim to have found no evidence because the investigative committee was largely denied access to the files by the state government. The public prosecutor's office did not investigate further. Roth wrote in Schmutzige Demokratie, a 2016 compendium of vignettes, for example that a young Hungarian politician who would later rise to international prominence was the victim of kompromat, because he had accepted a considerable bribe from a Russian organized crime figure through an intermediary twenty years earlier. However, Roth and his publisher chose not to expose themselves to a suit of libel.